Apr 18
So quite a few of you were offended by Wednesday’s debate. I wasn’t as much “offended” as I was “amused.” I kept waiting for the next question to come out of George Stephanopoulos’ mouth, each one kookier than the last. I seriously thought he was going to ask Obama if he was, after all, a Muslim.
Sure, I was somewhat giddy that Obama was finally the target, as opposed to Hillary, who has consistently come under media sniper fire. But I thought the debate was a sham. It was also the most watched debate of this campaign. People realized this could be the final final.
Just like any TV show, even if it had gone bad a long time ago, people tune into the season finale because they want to see how it ends. Kind of like The Bachelor. I mean, last season turned out to be the most dramatic rose ceremony ever. Brad rejected both of them! Maybe that’s what we’ll do!
Amid ABC’s damage control, George has defended his role as moderator during the much-criticized debate — in particular, asking Obama about his relationship (no matter how flimsy) with former political radical William Ayers.
“We have been researching this for a while,” Stephanopoulos said in a phone interview. “Part of what we discovered is that Sen. Obama had never been asked directly about it, even though it’s being written about and talked about and Republicans are signaling that this is gonna be an issue in the general election.”
OK, so this might be lame, as DMWP pointed out yesterday, but whether or not George was pulling from the Republican handbook, he gave Obama a chance to respond to a rumor that has been circulating for months. I thought Obama was able to diffuse that with a strong response:
“This is a guy who lives in my neighborhood, who’s a professor of English in Chicago who I know and who I have not received some official endorsement from. He’s not somebody who I exchange ideas from on a regular basis. And the notion that somehow as a consequence of me knowing somebody who engaged in detestable acts 40 years ago, when I was 8 years old, somehow reflects on me and my values doesn’t make much sense, George.”
Guilt by association is a slippery slope indeed. I mean, my God, can you imagine if someday I run for president and I have to explain my relationships with all of YOU?!
The trackback URL is here.
How appropriate that the link to the Strphanopoulos response leads to the LA Times Entertainment section, rather than their National news or Political news section.
consider yourself lucky.
Cool. We can be the national guard duty you didn’t report for. Or you can blame it on the Pinot.
http://www.inthepinktexas.com
Re: 3. treehugger
I will disavow all of you. Until incriminating clips show up on YouTube.
Re: 4. Pink Lady
Damn, so much for my being Chief of Staph.
“… and I have to explain my relationships with all of YOU?!”
You mean all 6 of us?
I love how Sephanolopopolos was so quick to air laundry in his book, and is always ready to diss the Clintons on Sunday mornings, to prove how independent he is, only to fold like a lawn chair when he’s in the same room with Hillary.
I am just so honored to have been mentioned personally by the one and only Pink Lady in the main body of a post, I may just pass out. Or maybe it’s the vodka.
Re: 6. Fled The Asylum
George is about the same height as Putin’s new girlfriend and just as flexible (in his loyalties).
http://www.inthepinktexas.com
Re: 6. LegeBoy
GET OFF MY BLOG.
Fear not! I will never mention our nights of playing naked twister (spanish edition) with TJ officiating.