Jan 26
It would take a hardhearted person indeed to tell the parents of autistic children that their kids will be trapped in public schools that aren’t sufficiently funded to serve their needs, which is precisely what voucher advocates will be hoping this time around as they rely on an already well organized autism lobby to make yet another attempt to bring vouchers to Texas.
Anti-voucher groups claim that this would open the door to a more broad-based voucher program since students with other disabilities (and their lobbyists) would demand their own “scholarships.” Ultimately, this could put the state into the position or paying for disabled students to attend the kind of Indonesian madrassas that turned Sen. Barack Obama bin Hussein into a terrorist.
Nevertheless, the Statesman reports that Sen. Shapiro is working on a bill to create a voucher program for autistic students. “I’m not here to cover the expense of the tuition of a private school,” Shapiro said without acknowledging that she is also not here to cover the expense of public schools. The article did say, though, that she thought the legislature might need to increase the amount of money it gives public schools to work with autistic children.
Now, there’s an idea.
Of course if we increase funding for public schools to work with autistic students, then we’d have to increase funding for schools to accommodate students with other disabilities. Sliding a little further down this slippery slope to the pits of hell we’d have to increase funding for all students, which could actually help public education, and that just won’t do.
And so, you see, by insufficiently funding a thing, we can justify insufficiently funding it some more.
(Read more about the life of ITPT’s Senior Education correspondent at his personal blog.)
The trackback URL is here.
Don’t worry…Corte on the House side has a full-blown voucher bill filed on the House side. And we all know Bill Bennett will be back with a “virtual voucher” program to buy his educational software for those homeschoolers…I’m sure Andrea McWilliams (see cover of Austin Women[sic]) will be right there turning tricks, err lobbying for him.
“And so, you see, by insufficiently funding a thing, we can justify insufficiently funding it some more.”
That’s the pithiest statement describing the budget-writing philosophy of our great (big) state I have ever seen.
http://www.austinwomanmagazine.com/
Re: 1. Perry’s Mollycoddler
Is she a lobbyist or a matador?
/Is there a difference?
http://www.inthepinktexas.com
You act like vouchers are a bad thing. They’re the only way for public school kids to avoid hellfire.
Do you think Bill Zedler’s head would actually explode if we explained to him that vouchers could be used to build a madrassa in Arlington?
Re: 5. Huck Finn
It’s worth trying.
Re: 1. Perry’s Mollycoddler
Have you seen the inside photos? Creepy.
never under-estimate the hard-heartedness of your legislator . . . as i recall, the seemingly endless testimony from people with severe developmental disabilities didn’t stop those fools from the HHS re-org and all the Accenture crap.
is what’s good for the goose really what’s good for the gander?
Please don’t take away all our unfunded mandates. We teachers need something to gripe about.
Doesn’t competition make schools better?
If government monopolies are so great why don’t we all live in government housing?
Or all use public transportation?
Public schools aren’t underfunded. No one chooses them, they steal propety tax dollars. They should have to compete for funds like every other business.